Saturday, November 26, 2011
Day 3 - 'Fish is Fish'
I think this lesson was somewhat successful. It showed students that again, different book characters can have different perspectives but it also taught students that they can compare these perspectives using a Venn diagram to help them see how similar or different they are. Students can even find perspectives that are the same among the characters. Although the lesson plan has great intentions, I think about half the students were on board. As I observed students while they were reading and filling in their diagrams, I was noticing that many of them were doing just fine. There were others who told me they didn’t know how to fill in the diagram because they had never seen one before. Others were able to fill in the chart but were writing about what happened in the story instead of the actual perspectives of the characters. After the lesson, I looked over their diagrams and saw that there were still some students who had the wrong idea about the task. It was hard for me to tell what the problem was. Was it the directions of the task that was confusing or did they still not know how to depict a character’s perspective? Thankfully, I had used an exit card after the lesson which asked the students, “Which character’s perspective can you relate to? Why?” As I read through them, I was thankful to know that most of the students whom I thought were lost, actually showed understanding of perspective as I read their exit card.
As I think more about the Venn diagram confusion, I was surprised to see that at least some students knew how to use one. The proper use of a Venn diagram was something that I overlooked while I was planning the lesson and never thought to include it as an objective. I never stopped to think that maybe students wouldn’t know how to use one. I just assumed that they would know. So, I was glad to see that some students had no problem filling it in. Some of them even knew about the overlap section and how you can put information that both characters have in common. As I already mentioned, some students were confused on how to use one because they had never seen one before. Because of this, I had to and give extra support and explain to several students how to use it and what it was for.
If I were to teach this lesson again, I will definitely have to teach them what a Venn diagram is and how it is used. How can I expect them to use one if they’ve never been exposed to one before? It will be a good idea to model an example of how to fill it out as well. I will also have to make sure to model how to fill in perspective information so that they are not just writing summary statements about what happened in the book but rather how the characters felt and viewed objects or events. More guidance on the right path will I think, help them stay on track with the learning goal that different perspectives can be compared among book characters and recorded using a Venn diagram.
Day 2 - 'Seven Blind Mice'
Thinking about the lesson and based on their perspective charts, I had no evidence that any students struggled with the concept. However, I noticed that some students perhaps understood the concept more clearly than others. As I looked over their perspective charts, I noticed that some students drew their illustrations using a deeper knowledge of perspective. For example, in a drawing of the green mouse and how it perceived the object to be a snake, the student drew the mouse looking upward to the snake and the mouse was much smaller than the snake as well. Here, the student clearly understood perspective and that from the mouse’s perspective, indeed the snake should be much larger than the mouse and therefore, it should be looking upward if it would be looking at all. Many other students drew the mice smaller than the objects or even the same size of the objects. After seeing this, it was hard to know what they knew about the mice’s point of view. I asked myself many questions such as, “Do the students really know how to walk in a character’s shoes? How do students think these objects appeared in the eyes of the mouse? Did they think the mouse seen them as something much smaller, bigger or the same? So, although I knew that they understood the concept of perspective from yesterday and even tried to predict an author’s perspective, I was wondering if they learned how to see the perspective from a book character’s eyes. I wondered if they really could walk in the character’s shoes.
My objective for the task was for students to record the different perspectives or the things that the mice saw the object to be. It did not include for students to accurately portray the perspective itself. In other words, I didn’t expect for students to illustrate HOW the mice viewed the object or what it looked like FROM the mouse’s view. Although it was not required, I was happy to see that some students made some very accurate illustrations showing me that they were able to visualize and walk in the mouse’s shoes to help them see what the object looked like from the mouse’s perspective.
I think that for future lessons, I will instruct students to do this as well. This way, students aren’t merely just drawing pictures, but they are using critical thinking skills too. It will be important that I model this so that they know what is expected of their illustrations. And I will have to explain my thought processes to show them how I developed my picture. Furthermore, I will continue to give the students the option of writing or drawing but if they choose to write about the mice’s perspective, they will be required to not only tell me WHAT the mouse saw but, explain HOW the mice saw the objects. This is something I will have to model beforehand as well. Hopefully, the adjustment of this lesson plan will help future students practice walking in a character’s shoes as well as practice their critical thinking skills.
Day 1 - Multiple Perspectives
This feedback was very useful as it showed me they really had a grasp on the meaning of perspective. We were further able to analyze perspective as I showed them what the picture piece actually belonged to. The picture piece came from the book, “Zoom”. In this book, each page that you flip shows how the small picture piece fit into a larger picture. It’s literally like you are zooming out further and further until you see the ultimate, big picture. The students absolutely loved this book and they wanted a chance to make predictions about the author’s perspective as well as give their own. Since many students were so interested in thinking like the author, I gave them time to predict what he was thinking before we flipped the pages and share aloud with the class. This practice extended beyond my overall lesson objectives. Nowhere in my plans did I intend for them to predict an author’s perspective. It was nice to learn that my students were able and willing to think critically on their own.
This lesson also taught me that my students have such a creative imagination and have very good drawing skills as well. I was impressed with some of the things they came up with and their ability to portray their thoughts into an illustration simply amazed me. By no means did they try to ‘play it safe’ with their ideas. Most students really took the time to think outside of the box and made sure to accurately portray them into their drawings. Most of them included fine detail and covered up the entire page with illustration. Some students even had text in their drawings. Their work was another example of them performing beyond my lesson objectives.
Out of the entire lesson, I think there was only one student who struggled with the concept. When it was time for students to make their illustration, the student seemed lost and confused, I restated the directions to him the best that I could and told him to try his best. After the lesson, when I was looking at all of the drawings, I noticed he turned in a blank piece of paper. I’m not sure what he didn’t understand, whether it was the concept itself or if it was just the directions that confused him. I think that for students like him, I may have needed to explain the directions of the task more clearly. I think I should’ve used a visual model of how to take a piece of the picture and illustrate it into a much larger picture. I should’ve modeled how to draw my picture as well as modeled all of my thought processes as I went along.
If I were to teach this lesson again, I would definitely keep all of the components since for the most part, they were very successful. Although, as I already stated, I will have to make sure that I model how to do an illustration using a small picture piece. I will make sure that students see how I’m doing it and also hear my thought processes at the same time. Perhaps this will make the directions more clear and ALL students will know how to do their own drawing. Another thing that I may change for future lessons is extend the objectives by having students think about the author’s perspective while going through the Zoom book. I thought it was fantastic that the students not only thought of their own perspective but took the time to try to think of someone else’s. This activity could really enhance student learning as it helps them to practice critical thinking skills, something that they will need to have later on in the unit. This is definitely something that could be practiced with future students.
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Lit Lesson Three Reflection
Lit Lesson Two Reflection
Lit Lesson One Reflection
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Literacy Lesson Day 3- Making Predictions
On the third day of my unit my students practiced making predictions. I started class by asking students to tell me what a prediction is. They have been making many predictions in science, so they were able to tell me that it is a guess about what might happen. I really wanted to emphasize to them that when we are making a prediction there is no right or wrong. I then asked them to tell me what would be good things to include in a prediction. As a class the students decided that they should explain why they think their prediction was going to happen and use evidence from the book to support their ideas.
We did popcorn reading and then it was time for the students to make their predictions. Some of the students really struggled and I heard from many of them that they could not make a prediction because they did not know what was going to happen next. Many of them seemed concerned about making an incorrect prediction. As a result I had quite a few students read ahead or look at the end of the book to find out what was going to happen.
Literacy Lesson Day 2-Making Connections
On the day of my second lesson, I wanted my students to work on making text-to-self connections. I began the lesson talking about making connections to what we are reading and I gave an example of a connection I made to the chapter we read the day before. I then asked students to share any connections they made with the previous chapters. A few students were willing to share their connections, and I made sure to point out to the class the importance of using evidence from the text to support their ideas.
I put my students in pairs and had them read the next chapter to each other. Then they were to discuss the chapter and individually respond to a writing prompt. The prompt asked them if they ever felt like the main character did when she thought about running away. I thought that this would be an easy prompt for the students to respond to because most young children have considered running away from home a one point or another. But I was surprised to hear many of my students say that they couldn’t respond to the prompt because they did not have any connections to the book. A lot of my boys told me that since the main character is a girl they are not able to relate to her or have any connections to her. The students were thinking very literally about the concept of making connections and were not able to think of more in depth ideas.
If I were to teach this lesson again I would spend more time talking about making connections. I would explain more about how we do not have to experience the same exact thing as what is happening in the book in order to have a connection to the text. I might even read a short story and have the students practice making connections with it and talk about the connections as a class so that students could see more examples of how to make connections to what they are reading.
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Linda Nguyen-Reflections (Daily Lessons 1,2, and 3)
After exploring the book I read the prologue aloud. Before reading I instructed students to listen for main events that seem to have connections with other events. I reminded students that important events are events that give us more insight to coming events that are going on in the story and that they should not be just minor details. After I read the prologue aloud I asked students to list off events that they thought were important to remember for the rest of the book. The first couple answers were right on target of main events that the author explicitly noted in the prologue. However, some students listed off details that were not as focused, such as the time of day or year it was. We also discussed the author's style of writing and how she wrote in a way the was suspenseful. Students made very valid points of how the author created suspense, but after a few students said there answer many students would repeat previous answers. Another concept students learned was to use the descriptions in the book to create a visualization of setting.
I had a few students that struggled with transitioning from me reading and then writing written responses. Those students kept asking, "what are we suppose to be doing?", even after I gave examples and explicit directions. These students also did not want to read the book at all and seem to have little interest in the fantasy genre.
For many of my students I learned that they are very insightful on picking out main events from the book. Most were also very engaged and excited to read what was going to happen next. I also learned that students are able to make predictions by connecting what they know and using it to form interpretive guesses on what will happen next in the story.
Some students in my class are slower readers than others. Even though I have different fluency levels in my class I wanted to read the first portion of the book aloud so that all students could follow along and focus more on the events that happened and less on their own fluency. For students that were still struggling I will talk with them one on one while the rest of the class is writing their responses and be more explicit of what we are doing and what they should be thinking about.
If I were to teach the same lesson again I would be sure to only pick one focus for the lesson. I think I tried to pack too much into one day with connecting events, investigating the book, looking at the author's style of writing, and the reading skill of visualization. If I were to do it again I would narrow my focus and look at just initially investigating the book and connecting events of the prologue. I think if I was more focus on just a few objectives it would be a good pace for students to really engage in those skills and that they could devote more time and thought to those areas instead of rushing and spreading out the time too thin. I would also like to emphasize that the skills we are using are the skills that my students can continually use as they read other books outside of class. I want students to know that these skills can help them become better readers in general.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Lesson Reflection Day 1
Today was the first day of the unit and I think that the lesson went very well. I started off my reading the prologue aloud to my students and then together as a class we completed a triple venn diagram to see how the events in the prologue were connected. My students have used venn diagrams before, but I made sure that I reviewed what information went in each space. The students did very well with filling out the venn diagram. I told them that they had to use their books to find details in the text to support their answers. We have asked students to use details from their text before, but that has been something that they forget to do. Today they were able to give me many details from the book and explain why they thought those details were important.
I also read the first chapter aloud to my students. The author used many descriptive words to describe the main setting of the book. While I was reading I asked my students to visualize what the author was describing and draw the setting. A few paragraphs were hard for my students to understand, so I would reread those sentences and talk about them more to help students understand what they author was trying to say. If students were having a hard time drawing their pictures, I had them look back through the chapter to reread the descriptions of the setting. Once the students were finished with their pictures, I had them share their drawings with their partner and explain what details from the book they included in the picture. Some of my students struggle with writing, so they really like being able to draw and explain their ideas instead of having to write them out.
From looking at the drawings that my students made I can see that some of them were able to understand the text and that others still need some help. The author uses many metaphors and some of the students need help with understanding what she is trying to say. But overall their drawings included many of the important details from the text. The venn diagrams had many great details because we did them together as a class. Some of the students have difficulty finding similarities between things. They notice small things like that both characters are girls, but it is hard for them to make bigger connections.
We will be revisiting the venn diagram later to add new details that we have read. So I am going to talk more about trying to find the important connections to help the students who are struggling with that. All throughout the book I am going to be asking students to find descriptive words and to be thinking about how these words help them visualize the story better.
If I were to teach this lesson again one thing I might change would be how I did chapter one. I think I would read the chapter once with students following along in their own books. Then I would have them put their books down and listen to me read the chapter again while they draw the setting. I think that it would be easier for them to find the details of the setting if they had multiple exposures to the text and if they had an opportunity to see and hear the text.
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Summarizing and Using Textbooks
This week I chose to read chapters 11 and 14 in Strategies that Work.
Chapter 11 is about summarizing and synthesizing information. I chose to read this chapter because at the end of the month my students have a book report due and part of their book report requires them to briefly summarize the story they read. Summarizing text is still a challenge for many of my fifth graders. It is difficult for them to decide which details are important to retell and which details are not needed. In the section called “Writing a Short Summary,” (p.188-189) the teacher tells her students to consider three things when they are summarizing a text. 1) Pick out the most important ideas. 2) Keep it brief. 3) Say it in your own words in a way that makes sense. I think that the third idea is the most important. Many of my students want to just rewrite what is written in their books. But they will have a better understanding of what they read if they are able to say it using their own words. I think that to help my students understand summarizing, it would be good to summarize something together as a class. Then students who are struggling can see how other people summarize.
Chapter 14 is about reading to understand textbooks. I think that the most important thing in this chapter is that students need to be taught how to use a textbook. Textbooks are full of resources such as glossaries, indexes, maps, charts, and other helpful pieces of information. But unless we teach our students how to use these things they will not be able to take advantage of what their textbooks have to offer. At the start of the year my MT had our students do a scavenger hunt of their social studies textbook so that they could become familiar with the different parts of the book. I think this was a good idea because she was also able to explain how to use different parts of the book when they went over the answers as a class. In this chapter they also talked about teaching students how to take notes from textbooks (p. 238). I think this is really important because textbooks an have so much information that it can be hard for students to pick out the important details. (Just like it can be hard for them to pick out the important details when they are summarizing what they read.)
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Creating Mental Movies
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Feedback from Cheryl
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Rubrics - A Good Assessment Tool?
“Make Assessment Count”, from “Writing Essentials” was eye opening for me. Routman talked about many important things such as putting rubrics into perspective. As I began to write my rubric, I automatically wrote a list of things that my students must write about in their presentations. At first this sounded like a good idea but, Routman makes a lot of sense when he suggests that this “sends a message to students that writing to the formula matters, not the content.” I guess if students were told what to write about, it limits their own development of ideas. And if one of our goals as teachers is for our student’s writing to improve, we must assess writing with a broader lens. How else will our students become ‘free’ writers?
Rubrics do have a good purpose of helping students stay on track of the task and help teachers evaluate and prepare further instruction as needed. However, when it comes to using rubrics, Routman clearly says, “Don’t overdo it.” But, it’s important not to focus so much on a checklist that you end up losing track of what the child is trying to do, which may be something not in the rubric but something worth positive recognition. Routman says, “It is not advisable to apply rubrics to all writing nor to score all writing. Just as our students need lots of practice reading many texts without expectation that they will be assessed on everything they read, they need lots of practice writing without being assessed on everything they write.”
I’m really glad to have read this during the time of trying to design my own rubric. And although I am indeed using a rubric, I will try not to ‘rubricize’ my students, as Routman puts it. I will give my students the freedom to develop their own ideas in their presentations and try to pay attention to the big picture at what my students are trying to say. I actually love the idea of creating a child-friendly rubric as mentioned in the chapter. If there will be guidelines, I guess the least I can do is collect student’s input as to what they want to include in the rubric. What do you all think about rubrics? Do any of you have ideas for how to design a rubric without ‘rubricizing’ students? What assessment tools have you seen or used that you really like working within your classrooms?
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Book Love.
Saturday, September 17, 2011
Spelling
Regie Routman has some great ideas that she shares in Writing Essentials. The topic that stood out the most to me in chapters 7-9 was spelling. According to Routman, “Students who struggle mightily with spelling or worry unnecessarily about perfect spelling do not write fluently or easily.” (p. 161) But in the age of spell check, I feel like spelling has been pushed to the side in many schools.
In my school, the fifth grade teachers decided to forego their usual spelling program this year because they felt they could use their class time in a more productive way. I grew up always having a spelling test at the end of each week, so I was curious to see how my teacher would integrate spelling into her literacy teaching.
I think that even without using a specific spelling program, teachers can help their students become better spellers and Routman gave some great tips on how to do this. Her first tip is to create a learning environment that encourages students to be good spellers. This includes having spelling references available, opportunities to write, talk, and read about words, and time to write everyday. (p. 162) She also says that teachers need to value spelling approximations. When students learn how to spell by rote memorization, they are not necessarily learning how letters and sounds work. But students who are given the opportunity to use invented spelling can gain a better understanding of the spelling system and are likely to write more since they are focused on spelling every word correctly. (p. 162)
Routman cautions not to let invented spellings go too far though. She says that while it is okay for students to misspell unfamiliar words, they should be expected to spell frequently used words. Many spelling errors in a paper can make it difficult for a reader to concentrate on what the author is trying to say. So a final tip from Routman is to tell our students why correct spelling is important. Unless students understand the importance of spelling, they are unlikely to give it the attention it deserves. (p. 164)
Routman’s views on spelling were especially interesting to me since it is a topic that has been discussed at my school recently. How does your teacher approach spelling instruction? Do you think weekly spelling tests are important? What else did you find interesting in Writing Essentials?
Saturday, September 10, 2011
Linda Nguyen-Be explicit!
When reading chapter one of Strategies that Work I was challenged to be explicit and model to my students the way good readers read. Sometimes I forget how much students gain from simply watching the actions of their teacher. Knowing the influence teachers have on students, I'm more aware of modeling to my students what I'm trying to teach them. In TE class this past Thursday I remember a student talking about D.E.A.R time and that during this time students and teachers in the classroom would drop everything and read. I thought this was one great example of how to model reading, but in the book being explicit is taken to a deeper level. The book gives an example of a teacher that picks out a book to read to the class that she personally connects to. During the reading the teacher explains what she is thinking while she is reading and how she is connecting to the characters in the book out loud. She also put in sticky notes in the book as she's reading to help her remember parts where she had a strong connection with what was happening in the book. So many times in the classrooms I've observed I've seen teachers read aloud to their students, but rarely have I seen teachers share their personal connections and thinking. Seeing the students reaction in sharing about stories that connected with them showed me the power of leading by example. Do you have any examples of explicit literary teaching? If so, did it seem to be a good model for your students to follow?